In the field of laser cleaning, fiber lasers have achieved success with their higher reliability, stability and flexibility
A good choice for laser cleaning light sources.
As the two major components of fiber lasers, continuous fiber lasers and pulsed fiber lasers are respectively stable
It firmly holds a leading position in the markets of macro material processing and precision material processing. For the emerging laser cleaning
When it comes to applications, there are different opinions on whether continuous lasers or pulsed lasers should be used. At the same time, two types of laser cleaning equipment using both pulsed and continuous lasers have emerged in the market. Many industrial end users are at a loss as to how to choose when making a selection.
Tests show that both continuous lasers and pulsed lasers can remove paint from the surface of materials to achieve clarity
The effect of washing. Under the condition of the same power, the cleaning efficiency of pulsed lasers is much higher than that of continuous lasers
At this time, the pulsed laser can better control the heat input, preventing the substrate temperature from being too high or causing micro-melting. Continuous lasers have a price advantage and can make up for the efficiency gap with pulsed lasers by using high-power lasers. However, high-power continuous light has a greater heat input and will also increase the degree of damage to the substrate.
Therefore, there are fundamental differences between the two in terms of application scenarios. High precision requires strict control of the base material
In application scenarios where temperature rise is required and the substrate must be undamaged, such as molds, pulsed lasers should be chosen. For some large steel structures, pipelines, etc., due to their large volume and fast heat dissipation, and the requirement for substrate damage is not high, continuous lasers can be selected.